Cleveland Judge Leslie Celebrezze Sentenced to Jail Ahead of Explosive Summer Jurist Investigation in Same Court

Published: Jun 2, 2026 - 2:31 p.m.

By D Heckman

---

CLEVELAND, OHIO — Former Cuyahoga County Domestic Relations Court Judge Leslie Ann Celebrezze, once a member of one of Ohio's most influential political families and one of the most recognizable names in Northeast Ohio's legal community, was sentenced June 1 to 60 days in jail after pleading guilty to felony tampering with public records, bringing a dramatic end to a scandal that exposed misconduct inside one of the region's most powerful courts and raised new questions about accountability throughout the local justice system. The sentence marked a stunning downfall for a judge whose family name had been synonymous with public service for generations. It also underscored a larger lesson that extends beyond a single courtroom, a single judge or a single case. The misconduct was not uncovered by routine oversight. It was exposed because citizens asked questions, a whistleblower took risks, reporters pursued records, and the public demanded answers. For years, the Celebrezze family occupied a unique place in Ohio political history. Since the 1920s, members of the family held positions across nearly every level of government, producing a Cleveland mayor, federal judges, state legislators, Ohio Supreme Court justices, and numerous municipal and county jurists. Leslie Celebrezze continued that legacy when she became the first woman in the family to win elected office in 2009, succeeding her father, James Celebrezze, on the Domestic Relations Court bench. Before becoming a judge, she spent years serving the public as a registered nurse and magistrate. What followed, however, would ultimately transform a legacy of public service into one of the most consequential judicial corruption scandals in modern Cuyahoga County history. According to court records and disciplinary findings, Celebrezze used her position as administrative judge to bypass the court's mandatory random case assignment system. Instead of allowing cases to be distributed through the established process designed to prevent favoritism and judge shopping, she manually directed complex and financially lucrative divorce cases to her own docket. Once those cases were under her control, she repeatedly appointed longtime family friend and businessman Mark Dottore, or his daughter Camille Dottore, as court-appointed receivers responsible for overseeing marital assets. Receivers are intended to serve as neutral third parties. Their appointments can carry significant financial implications because their fees are paid by litigants. Investigators determined that between 2017 and 2023, nearly $500,000 in fees were approved for Dottore's company through cases assigned to Celebrezze. To conceal the manipulation, official court records were allegedly falsified to state that cases had been randomly assigned when they had actually been directed to her courtroom. At the center of the scandal was a personal relationship that investigators concluded should have disqualified Celebrezze from handling matters involving Dottore. Publicly, both had initially maintained their relationship was professional. Investigations later revealed extensive communications between the pair, including more than 300 hours of telephone conversations in a single year. Court records cited in the disciplinary proceedings further indicated that Celebrezze had consulted attorneys regarding a divorce from her husband and admitted to fellow judges that she was in love with Dottore. In 2025, she formally acknowledged that those feelings influenced her decision to circumvent the random assignment system. The unraveling of the scheme began not inside government offices but through the actions of ordinary people. A litigant became suspicious, a private investigator started watching, a courthouse employee refused to look away, and a reporter kept digging. One of the pivotal moments came during the divorce proceedings involving Strongsville businessman Jason Jardine. Questions surrounding judicial actions in the case led Jardine to hire a private investigator. The surveillance that followed documented interactions between Celebrezze and Dottore that became central to later legal challenges. The resulting evidence ultimately supported a successful affidavit of disqualification and prompted Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Sharon Kennedy to remove Celebrezze from the case in August 2023. At nearly the same time, investigative reporting by The Marshall Project and Cleveland Scene was examining court-appointed receiverships within the Domestic Relations Court. That reporting would become a major turning point. Reporters sought public records that documented the movement of cases and the appointment of receivers. The records painted a picture that had remained largely hidden from public view for years. Critical to those efforts was judicial assistant Georgeanna "Georgia" Semary, a 15-year court employee who provided access to public files when reporters requested them. According to records provided, Semary later faced retaliation that included disciplinary actions, demotion, isolation and a substantial reduction in pay. She eventually resigned, cooperated with federal investigators and filed a whistleblower lawsuit that resulted in a $400,000 settlement funded by county taxpayers. The public reporting, the whistleblower disclosures, and mounting legal challenges attracted the attention of federal investigators. Pressure intensified after an FBI grand jury subpoena was delivered to the court in February 2025. Months later, the legal consequences became unavoidable. Celebrezze was charged Dec. 22, 2025, with one count of tampering with public records related to a falsified court entry. She resigned from the bench that same day. She later pleaded guilty and was sentenced by Visiting Judge Mark Wiest on June 1, 2026. According to the record, Wiest concluded that incarceration was necessary because the offense involved the abuse of public office and had caused what he described as "incalculable harm" to public confidence in the judiciary. Celebrezze was ordered to serve 60 days in jail, pay a $10,000 fine and cover court costs. Following her conviction, she is expected to face permanent disbarment. Separate court rulings also ordered Dottore to repay substantial sums tied to receivership and legal fee disputes, including hundreds of thousands of dollars in one ruling and nearly $1.3 million in another. Yet perhaps the most important aspect of the story is not the sentence, the fine or even the conviction itself. It is the reality that none of it may have happened without public scrutiny. The mechanisms that eventually held a powerful judge accountable were not triggered automatically. They were triggered because people questioned what they were seeing. Reporters reviewed records. Sources came forward. Citizens demanded explanations. Transparency only worked because someone insisted on transparency. Had those questions never been asked, had records never been examined and had whistleblowers remained silent, there is little reason to believe the conduct would have been publicly exposed when it was. The scandal serves as a reminder that courts exercise extraordinary authority over families, finances, children and futures. Public confidence in those institutions depends upon the ability of citizens and journalists to scrutinize them when concerns arise. The events surrounding Celebrezze have also fueled broader concerns about whether the problems exposed in this case were isolated or symptomatic of deeper issues. That question now sits at the center of another ongoing investigation. Cleveland 13 Investigative reporters have spent months examining allegations involving another judge within the same court. The investigation remains ongoing, and no conclusions will be published until reporting is complete and all relevant parties have been given an opportunity to respond. Reporters have reviewed extensive materials that include video recordings, audio recordings, public records, court documents and witness accounts. The information is currently undergoing additional verification and legal review. The upcoming reporting will examine allegations concerning conduct that sources claim was intended to preserve institutional power and maintain existing systems within the court. Cleveland 13 News has not reached final conclusions regarding those allegations and continues to seek responses from individuals involved. The investigation is expected to be published later this summer. What is already clear is that the Celebrezze case fundamentally changed the conversation surrounding accountability within Cuyahoga County's judiciary. For years, questions about transparency inside the court system rarely reached public attention. Today, those questions are being asked more frequently and with greater urgency. The conviction of a judge from one of Ohio's most prominent political families demonstrated that public institutions remain accountable when evidence is examined, records are reviewed and facts are allowed to speak for themselves. The story that ended with a former judge reporting to jail began with citizens refusing to accept unexplained actions from public officials. It continued because whistleblowers came forward and journalists followed the evidence wherever it led. The next chapter of that story may still be unfolding. -------------------- At Cleveland 13 News, we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date, and reliable reporting. If you spot an error, omission, or have information that may need updating, please email us at tips@cleveland13news.com. As a community-driven news network, we appreciate the help of our readers in ensuring the integrity of our reporting.