Trump Fires Top Jobs Official After Disastrous Report from Labor Statistics Office
- Analese Hartford

- Aug 2
- 3 min read
WASHINGTON D.C. — President Donald Trump dismissed Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer on August 1, 2025, following the release of a disappointing July jobs report that showed only 73,000 jobs were added and that job growth figures for May and June had been revised downward by a total of 258,000. Trump accused McEntarfer, a Biden appointee confirmed with bipartisan Senate support, of manipulating the data, though he did not present evidence to support the claim.
The action triggered a sharp response in financial markets, with the S&P 500 dropping more than 1.5 percent amid mounting investor concerns over the credibility of U.S. government economic data. Economists and former officials from both Democratic and Republican administrations warned that dismissing a career statistician over standard data revisions could erode public confidence in federal statistical agencies.
Critics emphasized that the Bureau of Labor Statistics follows long-established, nonpartisan methods for compiling labor data and that the downward revisions reflected routine updates based on employer feedback. Former BLS commissioners, including those appointed under previous Republican administrations, publicly condemned the firing as politically motivated and dangerous to the institution's independence.
The jobs report also highlighted broader economic challenges. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2 percent, and the revisions showed a significant slowdown in hiring, particularly in manufacturing, construction, and landscaping. Health care and social assistance were among the few sectors with notable job gains. The slowdown follows policy actions such as new tariffs and stricter immigration enforcement, which analysts say have added uncertainty for employers and may have contributed to hiring hesitations.
William Wiatrowski, the bureau's deputy commissioner, was appointed acting director while the White House considers a permanent replacement. Trump is also positioned to influence monetary policy further, as he is expected to fill a vacant Federal Reserve Board seat following the resignation of Governor Adriana Kugler. This could impact the Fed’s decision-making, especially as the weak jobs report is likely to be a major factor at its September meeting, where a potential interest rate cut is now widely anticipated.
Economists noted that the Federal Reserve had previously cited robust labor market data as justification for holding rates steady, but the newly revised figures weaken that argument. The labor market's three-month average job gains fell sharply, suggesting broader cooling in economic activity.
Prominent media commentators and financial analysts criticized the firing as an effort to politicize a nonpartisan institution. CNBC economics reporter Steve Liesman called the move an unfounded attack on civil servants and likened it to the behavior seen in authoritarian regimes, where statistical offices are manipulated for political ends.
A coalition of economists and statisticians, including former BLS Commissioner William Beach, stated that there was no valid basis for McEntarfer’s dismissal and warned it undermines the credibility of vital economic statistics. Republican lawmakers such as Senator Thom Tillis voiced concern about the precedent it sets and its long-term implications for data transparency.
McEntarfer, in a brief social media post, said it had been the honor of her life to lead the BLS and praised the dedication of its staff. She reaffirmed the bureau’s commitment to its mission of providing accurate, timely, and impartial data.
----------------------
At Cleveland 13 News, we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date, and reliable reporting. If you spot an error, omission, or have information that may need updating, please email us at tips@cleveland13news.com. As a community-driven news network, we appreciate the help of our readers in ensuring the integrity of our reporting.


























































Comments