Emma Lyons on Why Women Must Stop Listening to the Voice That Tears Them Down
- Karen Moss-Hale
- 3 hours ago
- 4 min read
WCTU CLEVELAND 13 — Emma Lyons has a blunt name for the voice that tells so many women they are not enough. It is not intuition, she says. It is not protection. It is not even a misunderstood part of the self asking to be soothed. Lyons calls it the “inner narcissist,” a shame-driven internal voice that keeps women doubting themselves, shrinking themselves and, in many cases, mistaking self-punishment for self-awareness.
That idea sits at the center of Lyons’ work as a trauma writer and coach. Through her platform Trauma Matrix, she explores the lasting effects of shame, family dysfunction and generational trauma. Her message challenges a familiar belief that the inner critic is a protective force meant to keep people safe. Lyons sees it very differently.
“It’s exactly the same as a narcissist,” Lyons said during a recent podcast conversation. “But the call is coming from inside the house.”
Her argument is intentionally provocative, but it speaks to something many women recognize immediately. The relentless internal commentary that says they are too much, not enough, too emotional, too old, too loud, too needy, too visible, or somehow fundamentally flawed.
In Lyons’ view, that voice does not emerge out of nowhere. It is built over time through family dynamics, social conditioning and inherited patterns that pass from one generation to the next. She believes shame is often absorbed within family systems long before people understand what they are carrying.
In many dysfunctional families, she explained, one child becomes the scapegoat, absorbing blame, tension and emotional projections that others cannot process. Even when the messages are subtle, the result can be a child who grows into adulthood believing something is fundamentally wrong with them.
“For so long in my life, I thought I was the problem,” Lyons said.
Those internalized beliefs can follow people for decades, shaping decisions about careers, relationships and self-worth. Lyons believes many adults mistake these deeply ingrained narratives for objective truth when they are actually learned responses to their environment.
Central to her work is a distinction between guilt and shame. Though the two are often used interchangeably, Lyons argues they operate very differently.
Guilt focuses on behavior. Shame attacks identity.
“Guilt says, ‘I’ve done something bad,’” Lyons explained. “Shame says, ‘You’re bad.’ That’s identity level.”
Psychological research has long linked chronic shame to anxiety, depression and self-sabotaging behavior. While guilt can motivate people to repair mistakes, shame often produces the opposite effect. It drives withdrawal, defensiveness and self-criticism.
Lyons believes shame persists not because it helps people grow, but because it has historically been used as a tool of control.
“Shame is always a control mechanism,” she said. “It’s always a manipulation.”
Cultural expectations, particularly those aimed at women, can intensify that dynamic. Messages about appearance, aging, behavior and success reinforce a constant pressure to measure up. In that environment, women may internalize harsh self-monitoring as a form of responsibility.
Instead, Lyons argues it becomes a trap.
Women are taught to scan themselves for flaws before anyone else can point them out. They anticipate criticism. They shrink themselves in order to avoid judgment. Over time, that self-surveillance becomes so familiar it feels like common sense.
Lyons believes that pattern is reinforced socially as well. People who carry unresolved shame may unconsciously project it onto others, criticizing or tearing down someone else to momentarily relieve their own discomfort.
“We shame each other,” she said. “And it gives us temporary relief from the shame we’re experiencing.”
The result is a cycle in which shame spreads and reinforces itself.
Still, the heart of Lyons’ message is not diagnosis but interruption. She wants women to recognize that the voice criticizing them does not automatically deserve authority simply because it exists.
In her work, Lyons encourages people to identify shame-based thoughts and refuse to engage with them. Instead of debating the inner critic or trying to satisfy it, she suggests recognizing it for what it is and stepping away from its demands.
“You refuse to engage,” she said. “You drop the rope.”
The approach involves identifying the moment shame surfaces, exposing the message behind it and grounding oneself in the present rather than spiraling into self-attack.
“It’s not factually true,” Lyons said. “It’s inherited shame that’s been impressed on you.”
Perhaps the most striking element of Lyons’ perspective is her attempt to reclaim the word “shameless.”
In everyday language, the term is usually used as an insult. Lyons sees it differently.
Children, she notes, begin life without shame. They do not enter the world believing they are defective or unworthy. Those beliefs develop later, often through repeated exposure to criticism, comparison and social pressure.
“They’re completely shameless,” Lyons said.
To Lyons, reclaiming that state does not mean abandoning conscience or responsibility. It means refusing to internalize humiliation as a measure of personal worth.
“Shame is always a projection,” she said. “We only take it in with our consent.”
Learning to reject those projections can allow people to develop stronger boundaries, clearer self-worth and greater personal agency.
For women who have spent years battling self-criticism, that idea can be both unsettling and liberating. The most damaging critic in their lives may not be the loudest person they have encountered. It may be the voice they have carried quietly into every decision, every relationship and every reflection in the mirror.
Lyons believes recognizing that voice for what it is can change everything.
What if that voice is not wisdom at all, but an inheritance that can be refused?
What if the real work is not learning to manage shame more gracefully, but ending the relationship with it altogether?
In a culture that still profits from insecurity and self-doubt, Lyons argues that reclaiming that power may be the most radical step of all.
------------------------------
At Cleveland 13 News, we strive to provide accurate, up-to-date, and reliable reporting. If you spot an error, omission, or have information that may need updating, please email us at tips@cleveland13news.com. As a community-driven news network, we appreciate the help of our readers in ensuring the integrity of our reporting. New Cleveland Radio with Karen Moss Hale is an affiliate program of Cleveland 13 News. While the format and content guidelines for affiliated programming align with Cleveland 13 News editorial standards, the views, opinions, and commentary expressed in this article belong to the affiliate contributor and do not necessarily reflect those of Cleveland 13 News.
Comments